Archive

At the intersection of language, technology, and society, this journal begins its journey to explore how discourse shapes and is shaped by our digital world and to serve as an active platform for interdisciplinary inquiry. As humanity increasingly chooses to outsource its thinking to machines, there is a quiet irony in launching a journal dedicated to human discourse.

Here at the Noida Institute of Engineering and Technology, Greater Noida, the Department of Languages has always held a rather specific, and occasionally challenging, position. We sit in the middle of a premier technical institute, surrounded by technocrats, coding hubs, and innovation labs. Our students are brilliant future technologists. Yet, having stood at the front of classrooms for over three and a half decades, one truth remains absolute to me: technical skill, stripped of communicative tact, linguistic nuance, and humanistic grounding, is fundamentally hollow.

That reality is the driving force behind the inception of NIET Journal of Discourse, Technology, and Society (NJDTS). Generative AI isn't just a new software tool we need to accommodate in our syllabi; it is a monumental, seismic shift in how we read, write, and perceive truth. When a student can generate a perfectly grammatical, structurally sound essay in three seconds, we are forced to stop and ask ourselves what actual, meaningful communication looks like today.

The twenty-three papers gathered in this issue, themed Dialectic and the Digital: Language, Literature, and Culture in the Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence, tackle this very tension. They refuse to panic, and they refuse to blindly cheerlead. Instead, they look hard at what happens to the human mind and to our culture when we hand over the reins to algorithms.

A significant portion of the research here looks straight at the pedagogical fallout. Several contributors ask what happens when the productive struggle of writing is erased. We see stark warnings of a "data validation crisis" and "silent attrition"—the slow, quiet loss of our ability to think critically when we remove the necessary friction of learning. We also see deep concerns about the homogenization of the student voice. When a classroom relies on the same generative tools to write, the beautiful, messy individuality of human language begins to merge into a bland, boring, predictable average.

Beyond the classroom, the research in this issue probes how these technologies are fracturing our sense of self. Our authors explore digital doppelgängers, performative identities, and even the unsettling, very real intimacies people are forming with AI romance chatbots - proving that our deepest psychological wiring can be triggered by a synthetic voice.

Crucially, the authors also look at the architecture of the code itself, reminding us that these models are far from objective. In fact, as some of the research in this volume demonstrates, when applied to our own cultural contexts, generative AI often just launders and amplifies our oldest gender and social biases.

True communicative competence has always required ethical judgment, active listening, and a deep understanding of context. These are principles that echo ancient linguistic wisdom just as much as they apply to a modern engineering syllabus. As educators navigating this shift, our job isn't to ban the digital, but to keep human interaction alive and encourage our students to become expert communicators who use AI only as scaffolding.

We invite you to read these papers not as final verdicts, but as starting points. The conversation is only just the beginning.

Before I conclude, I must acknowledge the dedicated contribution of many people across our academic community without whom this inaugural issue would not have seen the light of day. We extend our heartfelt gratitude to our Chairperson, Dr Sarojini Agarwal; MD, Dr O P Agarwal; AMD, Dr Neema Agarwal; and Director, Dr Vinod M Kapse, whose institutional support and commitment to research excellence made this publication possible. The peer reviewers and Editorial Board, whose detailed critiques ensured the academic rigour of the selected papers, deserve special thanks, as do the contributing authors, whose research provides the substance of this volume and advances the ongoing dialogue between the humanities and technology.

We invite scholars, educators, and researchers to engage with the arguments presented in these pages and to contribute to future editions as we continue to examine the evolving relationships between language, culture, and technology.